The Key to Theosophy



Helena Petrovna Blavatsky

1831 -1891



The Key to Theosophy


Helena Petrovna Blavatsky


Key to Theosophy Index



Theosophy for the Masses



Q. And you think that Theosophy would, by stepping in, help to remove these

evils, under the practical and adverse conditions of our modern life?

A. Had we more money, and had not most of the Theosophists to work for their

daily bread, I firmly believe we could.


Q. How? Do you expect that your doctrines could ever take hold of the uneducated

masses, when they are so abstruse and difficult that well-educated people can

hardly understand them?

A. You forget one thing, which is that your much-boasted modern education is

precisely that which makes it difficult for you to understand Theosophy. Your

mind is so full of intellectual subtleties and preconceptions that your natural

intuition and perception of the truth cannot act. It does not require metaphysics or education to make a man understand the broad truths of Karma and Reincarnation. Look at the millions of poor and uneducated Buddhists and Hindus, to whom Karma and reincarnation are solid realities, simply because their minds have never been cramped and distorted by being forced into an unnatural groove.


They have never had the innate human sense of justice perverted in them by being told to believe that their sins would be forgiven because another man had been put to death for their sakes. And the Buddhists, note well, live up to their

beliefs without a murmur against Karma, or what they regard as a just

punishment; whereas the Christian populace neither lives up to its moral ideal,

nor accepts its lot contentedly. Hence murmuring and dissatisfaction, and the

intensity of the struggle for existence in Western lands.


Q. But this contentedness, which you praise so much, would do away with all

motive for exertion and bring progress to a stand-still.

A. And we, Theosophists, say that your vaunted progress and civilization are no

better than a host of will-o'-the-wisps, flickering over a marsh which exhales a

poisonous and deadly miasma. This, because we see selfishness, crime,

immorality, and all the evils imaginable, pouncing upon unfortunate mankind from this Pandora's box which you call an age of progress, and increasing pari passu with the growth of your material civilization. At such a price, better the

inertia and inactivity of Buddhist countries, which have arisen only as a

consequence of ages of political slavery.


Q. Then is all this metaphysics and mysticism with which you occupy yourself so much, of no importance?

A. To the masses, who need only practical guidance and support, they are not of much consequence; but for the educated, the natural leaders of the masses, those whose modes of thought and action will sooner or later be adopted by those masses, they are of the greatest importance. It is only by means of the

philosophy that an intelligent and educated man can avoid the intellectual

suicide of believing on blind faith; and it is only by assimilating the strict

continuity and logical coherence of the Eastern, if not esoteric, doctrines,

that he can realize their truth. Conviction breeds enthusiasm, and "Enthusiasm,"

says Bulwer Lytton, "is the genius of sincerity, and truth accomplishes no

victories without it;" while Emerson most truly remarks that "every great and

commanding movement in the annals of the world is the triumph of enthusiasm."

And what is more calculated to produce such a feeling than a philosophy so

grand, so consistent, so logical, and so all-embracing as our Eastern Doctrines?


Q. And yet its enemies are very numerous, and every day Theosophy acquires new opponents.

A. And this is precisely that which proves its intrinsic excellence and value.

People hate only the things they fear, and no one goes out of his way to

overthrow that which neither threatens nor rises beyond mediocrity.


Q. Do you hope to impart this enthusiasm, one day, to the masses?

A. Why not? Since history tells us that the masses adopted Buddhism with

enthusiasm, while, as said before, the practical effect upon them of this

philosophy of ethics is still shown by the smallness of the percentage of crime

amongst Buddhist populations as compared with every other religion. The chief

point is, to uproot that most fertile source of all crime and immortality-the

belief that it is possible for them to escape the consequences of their own

actions. Once teach them that greatest of all laws, Karma and Reincarnation, and

besides feeling in themselves the true dignity of human nature, they will turn

from evil and eschew it as they would a physical danger.



How Members Can Help the Society


Q. How do you expect the Fellows of your Society to help in the work?

A. First by studying and comprehending the theosophical doctrines, so that they

may teach others, especially the young people. Secondly, by taking every

opportunity of talking to others and explaining to them what Theosophy is, and

what it is not; by removing misconceptions and spreading an interest in the

subject. Thirdly, by assisting in circulating our literature, by buying books

when they have the means, by lending and giving them and by inducing their

friends to do so. Fourthly, by defending the Society from the unjust aspersions

cast upon it, by every legitimate device in their power. Fifth, and most

important of all, by the example of their own lives.


Q. But all this literature, to the spread of which you attach so much importance, does not seem to me of much practical use in helping mankind. This is not practical charity.

A. We think otherwise. We hold that a good book which gives people food for

thought, which strengthens and clears their minds, and enables them to grasp

truths which they have dimly felt but could not formulate-we hold that such a

book does a real, substantial good. As to what you call practical deeds of

charity, to benefit the bodies of our fellowmen, we do what little we can; but,

as I have already told you, most of us are poor, whilst the Society itself has

not even the money to pay a staff of workers. All of us who toil for it, give

our labor gratis, and in most cases money as well. The few who have the means of doing what are usually called charitable actions, follow the Buddhist precepts

and do their work themselves, not by proxy or by subscribing publicly to

charitable funds. What the Theosophist has to do above all is to forget his




What a Theosophist Ought Not to Do



Q. Have you any prohibitory laws or clauses for Theosophists in your Society?

A. Many, but-alas!-none of them are enforced. They express the ideal of our

organization, but the practical application of such things we are compelled to

leave to the discretion of the Fellows themselves. Unfortunately, the state of

men's minds in the present century is such that, unless we allow these clauses

to remain, so to speak, obsolete, no man or woman would dare to risk joining the Theosophical Society. This is precisely why I feel forced to lay such a stress

on the difference between true Theosophy and its hard-struggling and

well-intentioned, but still unworthy vehicle, the Theosophical Society.


Q. May I be told what are these perilous reefs in the open sea of Theosophy?

A. Well may you call them reefs, as more than one otherwise sincere and

well-meaning F.T.S. has had his Theosophical canoe shattered into splinters on

them! And yet to avoid certain things seems the easiest thing in the world to

do. For instance, here is a series of such negatives, screening positive

Theosophical duties:


No Theosophist should be silent when he hears evil reports or slanders spread

about the Society, or innocent persons, whether they be his colleagues or



Q. But suppose what one hears is the truth, or may be true without one knowing


A. Then you must demand good proofs of the assertion, and hear both sides

impartially before you permit the accusation to go uncontradicted. You have no

right to believe in evil, until you get undeniable proof of the correctness of

the statement.


Q. And what should you do then?

A. Pity and forbearance, charity and long-suffering, ought to be always there to

prompt us to excuse our sinning brethren, and to pass the gentlest sentence

possible upon those who err. A Theosophist ought never to forget what is due to the shortcomings and infirmities of human nature.


Q. Ought he to forgive entirely in such cases?

A. In every case, especially he who is sinned against.


Q. But if by so doing, he risks to injure, or allow others to be injured? What

ought he to do then?

A. His duty; that which his conscience and higher nature suggests to him; but

only after mature deliberation. Justice consists in doing no injury to any

living being; but justice commands us also never to allow injury to be done to

the many, or even to one innocent person, by allowing the guilty one to go



Q. What are the other negative clauses?

A. No Theosophist ought to be contented with an idle or frivolous life, doing no

real good to himself and still less to others. He should work for the benefit of

the few who need his help if he is unable to toil for Humanity, and thus work

for the advancement of the Theosophical cause.


Q. This demands an exceptional nature, and would come rather hard upon some


A. Then they had better remain outside the T.S. instead of sailing under false

colors. No one is asked to give more than he can afford, whether in devotion,

time, work, or money.


Q. What comes next?

A. No working member should set too great value on his personal progress or

proficiency in Theosophic studies; but must be prepared rather to do as much

altruistic work as lies in his power. He should not leave the whole of the heavy

burden and responsibility of the Theosophical Movement on the shoulders of the few devoted workers. Each member ought to feel it his duty to take what share he can in the common work, and help it by every means in his power.


Q. This is but just. What comes next?

A. No Theosophist should place his personal vanity, or feelings, above those of

his Society as a body. He who sacrifices the latter, or other people's

reputations on the altar of his personal vanity, worldly benefit, or pride,

ought not to be allowed to remain a member. One cancerous limb diseases the

whole body.


Q. Is it the duty of every member to teach others and preach Theosophy?

A. It is indeed. No fellow has a right to remain idle, on the excuse that he

knows too little to teach. For he may always be sure that he will find others

who know still less than himself. And also it is not until a man begins to try

to teach others, that he discovers his own ignorance and tries to remove it. But

this is a minor clause.


Q. What do you consider, then, to be the chief of these negative Theosophical


A. To be ever prepared to recognize and confess one's faults. To rather sin

through exaggerated praise than through too little appreciation of one's

neighbor's efforts. Never to backbite or slander another person. Always to say

openly and direct to his face anything you have against him. Never to make

yourself the echo of anything you may hear against another, nor harbor revenge

against those who happen to injure you.


Q. But it is often dangerous to tell people the truth to their faces. Don't you

think so? I know one of your members who was bitterly offended, left the

Society, and became its greatest enemy, only because he was told some unpleasant truths to his face, and was blamed for them.

A. Of such we have had many. No member, whether prominent or insignificant, has ever left us without becoming our bitter enemy.


Q. How do you account for it?

A. It is simply this. Having been, in most cases, intensely devoted to the

Society at first, and having lavished upon it the most exaggerated praises, the

only possible excuse such a backslider can make for his subsequent behavior and past short-sightedness, is to pose as an innocent and deceived victim, thus

casting the blame from his own shoulders onto those of the Society in general,

and its leaders especially. Such persons remind one of the old fable about the

man with a distorted face, who broke his looking-glass on the ground that it

reflected his countenance crookedly.


Q. But what makes these people turn against the Society?

A. Wounded vanity in some form or other, almost in every case. Generally,

because theirdicta and advice are not taken as final and authoritative; or else,

because they are of those who would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven.

Because, in short, they cannot bear to stand second to anybody in anything. So,

for instance, one member-a true "Sir Oracle"-criticized, and almost defamed

every member in the T.S. to outsiders as much as to Theosophists, under the

pretext that they were all untheosophical, blaming them precisely for what he

was himself doing all the time. Finally, he left the Society, giving as his

reason a profound conviction that we were all (the Founders especially)-Frauds!

Another one, after intriguing in every possible way to be placed at the head of

a large Section of the Society, finding that the members would not have him,

turned against the Founders of the T.S., and became their bitterest enemy,

denouncing one of them whenever he could, simply because the latter could not,

and would not, force himupon the Members. This was simply a case of an

outrageous wounded vanity. Still another wanted to, and virtually did,

practiceblack-magic-i.e., undue personal psychological influence on certain

Fellows, while pretending devotion and every Theosophical virtue. When this was put a stop to, the Member broke with Theosophy, and now slanders and lies against the same hapless leaders in the most virulent manner, endeavoring to

break up the society by blackening the reputation of those whom that worthy

"Fellow" was unable to deceive.


Q. What would you do with such characters?

A. Leave them to their Karma. Because one person does evil that is no reason for others to do so.


Q. But, to return to slander, where is the line of demarcation between

backbiting and just criticism to be drawn? Is it not one's duty to warn one's

friends and neighbors against those whom one knows to be dangerous associates?

A. If by allowing them to go on unchecked other persons may be thereby injured, it is certainly our duty to obviate the danger by warning them privately. But true or false, no accusation against another person should ever be spread

abroad. If true, and the fault hurts no one but the sinner, then leave him to

his Karma. If false, then you will have avoided adding to the injustice in the

world. Therefore, keep silent about such things with everyone not directly

concerned. But if your discretion and silence are likely to hurt or endanger

others, then I add: Speak the truth at all costs, and say, with Annesly,

"Consult duty, not events." There are cases when one is forced to exclaim,

"Perish discretion, rather than allow it to interfere with duty."


Q. Methinks, if you carry out these maxims, you are likely to reap a nice crop

of troubles!

A. And so we do. We have to admit that we are now open to the same taunt as the early Christians were. "See, how these Theosophists love one another!" may now be said of us without a shadow of injustice.


Q. Admitting yourself that there is at least as much, if not more, backbiting,

slandering, and quarreling in the T.S. as in the Christian Churches, let alone

Scientific Societies-What kind of Brotherhood is this? I may ask.

A. A very poor specimen, indeed, as at present, and, until carefully sifted and

reorganized,no better than all others. Remember, however, that human nature is

the same in the Theosophical Society as outof it. Its members are no saints:

they are at best sinners trying to do better, and liable to fall back owing to

personal weakness. Add to this that our "Brotherhood" is no "recognized" or

established body, and stands, so to speak, outside of the pale of jurisdiction.

Besides which, it is in a chaotic condition, and as unjustly unpopular as is no

other body. What wonder, then, that those members who fail to carry out its

ideal should turn, after leaving the Society, for sympathetic protection to our

enemies, and pour all their gall and bitterness into their too willing ears!

Knowing that they will find support, sympathy, and ready credence for every

accusation, however absurd, that it may please them to launch against the

Theosophical Society, they hasten to do so, and vent their wrath on the innocent

looking-glass, which reflected too faithfully their faces. People never forgive

those whom they have wronged. The sense of kindness received, and repaid by them with ingratitude, drives them into a madness of self-justification before the

world and their own consciences. The former is but too ready to believe in

anything said against a society it hates. The latter-but I will say no more,

fearing I have already said too much.


Q. Your position does not seem to me a very enviable one.

A. It is not. But don't you think that there must be something very noble, very

exalted, very true, behind the Society and its philosophy, when the leaders and

the founders of the Movement still continue to work for it with all their

strength? They sacrifice to it all comfort, all worldly prosperity, and success,

even to their good name and reputation-aye, even to their honor-to receive in

return incessant and ceaseless obloquy, relentless persecution, untiring

slander, constant ingratitude, and misunderstanding of their best efforts,

blows, and buffets from all sides-when by simply dropping their work they would find themselves immediately released from every responsibility, shielded from every further attack.


Q. I confess, such a perseverance seems to me very astounding, and I wondered why you did all this.

A. Believe me for no self-gratification; only in the hope of training a few

individuals to carry on our work for humanity by its original program when the

Founders are dead and gone. They have already found a few such noble and devoted souls to replace them. The coming generations, thanks to these few, will find the path to peace a little less thorny, and the way a little widened, and thus

all this suffering will have produced good results, and their self-sacrifice

will not have been in vain. At present, the main, fundamental object of the

Society is to sow germs in the hearts of men, which may in time sprout, and

under more propitious circumstances lead to a healthy reform, conducive of more happiness to the masses than they have hitherto enjoyed.





Key to Theosophy Index




Find answers to more questions

with these Theosophy links


Cardiff Blavatsky Archive

Life & Work of H P Blavatsky

A Theosophy Study Resource




Dave’s Streetwise Theosophy Boards

The Theosophy Website that Welcomes Absolute Beginners

If you run a Theosophy Study Group, please feel free

to make use of the material on this Website


The Most Basic Theosophy

 Website in the Universe

A quick overview of Theosophy 

and the Theosophical Society

If you run a Theosophy Study Group you 

can use this as an introductory handout.


Cardiff Theosophical Society meetings are informal

and there’s always a cup of tea afterwards




The Cardiff Theosophical Society Website




The National Wales Theosophy Website


Wales! Wales! Theosophy Wales

The All Wales Guide to

 Getting Started in Theosophy

This is for everybody not just people in Wales


Hey Look!

Theosophy in Cardiff


Theosophy in Wales

The Grand Tour


Theosophy Avalon

The Theosophy Wales

King Arthur Pages


Theosophy Cardiff’s Instant Guide

to Theosophy


Cardiff Theosophical Archive


Cardiff Theosophy Start-Up

A Free Intro to Theosophy


Pages About Wales

General pages about Wales, Welsh History

and The History of Theosophy in Wales


Blavatsky Blogger

Independent Theosophy Blog


Quick Blasts of Theosophy

One liners and quick explanations

About aspects of Theosophy


Great Theosophists

The Big Names of Theosophy

H P Blavatsky is usually the only

Theosophist that most people have ever

heard of. Let’s put that right


The Blavatsky Blogger’s

Instant Guide To

Death & The Afterlife


Death & How to Get Through It

Lentil burgers, a thousand press ups before breakfast and

the daily 25 mile run may put it off for a while but death

seems to get most of us in the end. We are pleased to

present for your consideration, a definitive work on the

subject by a Student of Katherine Tingley entitled

“Man After Death”


The Blavatsky Free State

An Independent Theosophical Republic

Links to Free Online Theosophy 

Study Resources; Courses, Writings, 

Commentaries, Forums, Blogs





The South of Heaven Guide

To Theosophy and Devachan


The South of Heaven Guide

To Theosophy and Dreams


The South of Heaven Guide

To Theosophy and Angels


Theosophy and Help From

The Universe


The Voice of the Silence


Feelgood Theosophy

Visit the Feelgood Lodge



The New Rock ‘n Roll




No Aardvarks were harmed in the

preparation of this Website


The Tooting Broadway

Underground Theosophy Website

The Spiritual Home of Urban Theosophy


The Mornington Crescent

Underground Theosophy Website

The Earth Base for Evolutionary Theosophy


Classic Introductory Theosophy Text

A Text Book of Theosophy By C W Leadbeater


What Theosophy Is  From the Absolute to Man


The Formation of a Solar System  The Evolution of Life


The Constitution of Man  After Death  Reincarnation


The Purpose of Life  The Planetary Chains


The Result of Theosophical Study


Elementary Theosophy

An Outstanding Introduction to Theosophy

By a student of Katherine Tingley


Elementary Theosophy  Who is the Man?  Body and Soul   


Body, Soul and Spirit  Reincarnation  Karma


The Seven in Man and Nature


The Meaning of Death


The Ocean of Theosophy

William Quan Judge


Preface    Theosophy and the Masters    General Principles


The Earth Chain    Body and Astral Body    Kama – Desire


Manas    Of Reincarnation    Reincarnation Continued


Karma    Kama Loka    Devachan    Cycles


Septenary Constitution Of Man


Arguments Supporting Reincarnation


Differentiation Of Species Missing Links


Psychic Laws, Forces, and Phenomena


Psychic Phenomena and Spiritualism


Instant Guide to Theosophy

Quick Explanations with Links to More Detailed Info


What is Theosophy ? Theosophy Defined (More Detail)


Three Fundamental Propositions  Key Concepts of Theosophy


Cosmogenesis  Anthropogenesis  Root Races  Karma


Ascended Masters  After Death States  Reincarnation


The Seven Principles of Man  Helena Petrovna Blavatsky


  Colonel Henry Steel Olcott William Quan Judge


The Start of the Theosophical Society Theosophical Society Presidents


History of the Theosophical Society  Glossaries of Theosophical Terms


History of the Theosophical Society in Wales


The Three Objectives of the Theosophical Society


Explanation of the Theosophical Society Emblem



A Study in Karma

Annie Besant


Karma  Fundamental Principles  Laws: Natural and Man-Made  The Law of Laws 


The Eternal Now  Succession  Causation The Laws of Nature  A Lesson of The Law


  Karma Does Not Crush  Apply This Law  Man in The Three Worlds  Understand The Truth


Man and His Surroundings  The Three Fates  The Pair of Triplets  Thought, The Builder


  Practical Meditation  Will and Desire  The Mastery of Desire  Two Other Points


  The Third Thread  Perfect Justice  Our Environment  Our Kith and Kin  Our Nation


The Light for a Good Man  Knowledge of Law  The Opposing Schools


The More Modern View  Self-Examination  Out of the Past


Old Friendships  We Grow By Giving  Collective Karma  Family Karma


National Karma  India’s Karma  National Disasters


Try these if you are looking for a

local Theosophy Group or Centre


UK Listing of Theosophical Groups


Worldwide Directory of 

Theosophical Links


International Directory of 

Theosophical Societies